THE HOMEWORK DEBATE


 By: Dr. Armãndo R. Tolliver | EDUCATOR | March 7, 2017
          The long-standing tradition of homework has been a perennial topic of debate in education, and is probably the most complicated pedagogical strategy teachers use because it is open to variations due to child individual differences and the home context (Marzano, Pickering, & Pollock, 2006; Vatterott, 2009; Cooper, 2015). Teachers are expected to assign homework because of beliefs of its positive impact, which sometimes conflicts with negative consequences. “The impact of homework on academic achievement is mediated by factors such as appropriateness of the design of homework, student learning abilities, student attitudes, and parent and peer support.” (Lee, 2005, p. 252). Assign too much, the wrong kind, or miss the mark on grading and feedback, and you have diminished the return on investment, resulting in no academic pay-off. Homework is intended to strengthen student skills, advance classroom instruction, and promote student responsibility in learning (Lee, 2005; Marzano et al., 2006; Cooper, 2015); however, that is often times combated with the teacher’s responsibility of creating and enforcing rules for students to complete homework when it is assigned. When students fail to complete homework, the teacher then has to administer a consequence for the missed assignment. Not to mention, teachers then spend hours grading the work that cannot be closely monitored for integrity, plus addressing the concerns of parents with regard to the amount of homework assigned.
Vatterott (2009) made the assertion "We tend to reward working, instead of learning." "Do the pile of work and you'll get the grade. Don't do the work—and even if you demonstrate mastery of the skill or content—you won't get the grade." Possibly worse is the message sent when we grade homework. "When we grade homework, we're rewarding students who learn the first time" (Vatterott, 2009), which can trade measures of learning and getting better at something for measures of compliance (Cooper, 2015).  If we grade kids while they are learning, then that penalizes kids for taking risks, self-assessing, making adjustments, practicing, and figuring out what works best for them to learn something, which can be lead to decreased intrinsic motivation and institutionalize failure (Vatterott, 2009). Additionally, even with diversity among learners in our classrooms, many teachers continue to assign the same homework to all students in the class, which could be contributing to the disproportionate number of students who fail from lower-income households for not doing homework, in essence punishing them for lack of an adequate environment in which to do homework (Vatterott, 2009). This is certainly a concept I never considered. On the contrary, homework grades can help students who work hard, but test poorly, receive a passing grade because when grades are averaged, high scores for homework completion tend to mask poor performance on other measures, producing a skewed picture of progress. Despite all of the debate, one thing that remains certain is that homework provides students with the opportunity to extend their learning outside the classroom (Varlas, 2002). Therefore, teachers should rethink the reasons for assigning homework and improve its instructional quality in order to ensure it is a sound and valuable pedagogical practice that deepens student understanding and builds essential skills.
            Vatterott (2009) highlighted five characteristics that are exhibited in the best homework. First, the task has a clear academic purpose, such as practice, checking for understanding, or applying knowledge or skills. Second, the task efficiently demonstrates student learning. Third, the task promotes owner ship by offering choices and being personally relevant. Fourth, the task instills a sense of competence—the student can successfully complete it without help. Last, the task is aesthetically pleasing—it appears enjoyable and interesting. This is important, especially to teachers who assign busy work or believe more equates to rigor. Most of my homework assignments are embedded with these characteristics, minus the third point, but students complete the work. So, I do not think this is really where my issue lies. Though, I could make a more conscientious effort to add more student choice in the homework assignments. Perhaps the best option to do this would be to use a choice board that would allow students to choose how they want to express the science content they are learning.
            As I reflect on how I have used homework as a strategy in the classroom, I must admit, I have been guilty of dangling the carrot at students to get them to do homework. “Remember homework is calculated into your grade. So make sure you do it.” Grant it, I have had about 90% completion rate on homework assignments, many students simply got together during lunch to rush and complete assignments, correctly or incorrectly, which minimized the return on investment. Additionally, it was rather difficult to know whether or not the student actually did the work or copied it from a friend.
            I liked the fact that homework brought about this sort of forced collaboration or study groups, but it brought about this false sense of progress and achievement. Regardless of how many times I reminded students of our academic honor statement and would say to students, “Do not copy other student’s assignments.  If you copy someone’s work or allow them to copy yours both people will receive a zero and get a phone call home.  This is a form of cheating and requires referral to discipline office. Not to mention your syllabus clearly says how to fail. Never, ever, do your homework, and if you decide to do homework, make sure you copy it from someone else,” unless the homework assignment was something that called for students to create something original or I gave an in-class assignment/quiz that came directly from the homework, it was sometimes difficult to determine who did what. Even at that, it is still difficult to know who is actually doing the assignment when it is taken home. For example, a student could get help from a parent, tutor, sibling or classmate to complete the work. Also, if a student completed an assignment, but had difficulty and did not bring them to my attention, he or she was indirectly penalized if I decided to give a pop quiz parallel to the homework assignment.
One of the things I think I do consistently ensure my students understand is that homework is assigned nightly, completing it is their responsibility as a student, and keeping up with the reading is very important! They need to stay up-to-date, and be prepared for a pop-quiz over reading or homework assignments at any time. This is not a class where cramming the day before a test will work!  So, they expect to complete a minimum of 3 hours of study outside of class each week, and those who are taking multiple courses are aware of the time commitment. Self-discipline is very important.  The vast majority of the students who do not pass my biology and environmental science classes have an inconsistent record of homework assignments and labs. The most successful students are those who make a daily commitment to their studies.
In more recent years, I began to use learning logs as an added homework tool to help students focus on learning through exploration of what they know. I use the learning logs as student reflections on specific subject material where they clarify ideas and articulate their understanding of the concepts. These also help students to improve writing fluency and depth of thought, a common struggle for many students. Essentially, they are asked to address three questions: a) what did you learn or what were the main ideas in today’s lesson, b) what did you find most interesting in what you learned or what did you understand best, and c) what questions do you still have about what you learned today or how do these ideas relate to what you have already learned. Check out this AVID worksheet for ways to differentiate the learning logs and correlate them to higher levels of thinking.
Assessment offers critical data about teaching and learning and can alter the direction and decisions made in a course. It also greatly impacts student and teacher success. When thinking about homework as a form of formative assessment, it might make more sense to use it to inform instructional practices and to give students advice without worrying about grades. Perhaps in the future, I will create a “no formal homework policy” or simply award LiveSchool points to students who complete homework and learning logs, which will give me time to simply focus on providing constructive feedback to students in order for them to enhance their understanding of content and use of skills before summative assessments. 
Suggested Citation
Tolliver, A. R. (2017). The Homework Debate. [Education Project Online]. Retrieved online at http://www.educationprojectonline.com/2017/03/the-homework-debate.html.

References
Cooper, H. M. (2015). The battle over homework: common ground for administrators, teachers, and parents. New York: Carrel Books.

Lee, S. W. (2005). Encyclopedia of school psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering. D. J, & Pollock, J. E. (2006). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.

Varlas, L. (2002). Getting acquainted with the essential nine. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
Curriculum Update.

Vatterott, C. (2009). Rethinking homework: best practices that support diverse needs. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

No comments: